Clause 12
Limitation of Liability
The total aggregate liability of the Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed...
Pontivus Legal is a bilingual contract review workflow: import DOCX, run the structured review in Pontivus, then export DOCX back to Word for final editing.
Contract Editor
Master Services Agreement · Clause 12
Clause 12
The total aggregate liability of the Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed...
Liability cap conflicts with CCC Section 222 — gross negligence cannot be contractually excluded under Thai law.
Legal Evidence
CCC §222มาตรา ๒๒๒ บุคคลผู้ไม่ชำระหนี้จะต้องรับผิดชอบชดใช้ค่าสินไหมทดแทน...
Section 222: A person who fails to perform an obligation is liable for compensation...
Manual checking, scattered edits, and informal sign-off make review slow, inconsistent, and hard to defend. The workflow breaks before legal teams can trust the decision.
Without Pontivus
Manual statute cross-referencing — slow per-clause work, inconsistent across reviewers
With Pontivus
Review stays tied to visible evidence and citations inside one legal workflow
Without Pontivus
AI edits circulate with no clear owner, weak rationale, and no clean version history
With Pontivus
Suggested edits, rationale, and draft history stay attached to one governed draft
Without Pontivus
Loose sign-off means no reviewer gate, no clean send-back path, and no defensible approval record
With Pontivus
Reviewer decisions stay visible through approval gates and send-back steps
Pontivus is where governed legal review happens. Word remains the familiar document format for bringing contracts in and circulating approved language out.
01
Import the agreement so clauses, parties, and sensitive fields are parsed into one review-ready draft.
02
Thai-law evidence, business rules, redaction, comments, send-backs, and approvals stay on one governed draft.
03
Send the reviewed agreement back for final formatting and circulation through your existing channels.
Word is for final formatting and circulation only. Structured legal review happens in Pontivus — not inside Word as an add-in.
Pontivus changes three parts of legal review: the evidence behind each finding, the context around each contract, and the controls around each decision.
Use Thai-law evidence and visible citations to support each finding with inspectable legal text.
Keep party names and signer roles visible so reviewers validate obligations against the right entities.
Contract Parties
Parties
Siam Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Andaman Systems Integration Co., Ltd.
Start in the right contract type context so reviewers are not improvising from pasted text alone.
Mask sensitive details before AI analysis so confidentiality is handled before model input.
PII Redacted
2 redactions
Clause 12
The total aggregate liability of the Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed...
Track open comments, send-backs, and approvals in a visible path before final sign-off.
Each clause moves through finding, evidence, reviewer input, and approval status in one place.
Contract Editor
Master Services Agreement · Clause 12
Clause 12
The total aggregate liability of the Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed...
Proposed
The total aggregate liability of the Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed...
Liability cap conflicts with CCC Section 222 — gross negligence cannot be contractually excluded under Thai law.
Legal Evidence
CCC §222มาตรา ๒๒๒ บุคคลผู้ไม่ชำระหนี้จะต้องรับผิดชอบชดใช้ค่าสินไหมทดแทน...
Section 222: A person who fails to perform an obligation is liable for compensation...
Nanthawat P.
Sent BackReviewer Suggestion
Send back: clarify carve-out for gross negligence and preserve Thai-law enforceability.
First the contract is prepared, then reviewed, then routed for decision in the same workflow.
Upload the agreement and match it to the right contract type before any review begins.
Redact sensitive details before AI analysis so confidential information stays out of model inputs.
Review clauses with Thai-law evidence, risk signals, and optional business rules in one editor.
Prepare revisions with supporting rationale and visible draft history for legal review.
Reviewers approve or send back drafts through visible feedback and approval gates.
This comparison reflects ad hoc general chat workflows, not purpose-built legal review systems.
ChatGPT
Copy/paste contract text between Word and chat with no structured handoff
Pontivus Legal
DOCX import, structured clause review, and DOCX export back to Word
ChatGPT
Citations, legal reasoning, and scope must be manually verified by the reviewer
Pontivus Legal
Findings stay tied to retrieved legal text with visible review history attached to the draft
ChatGPT
Internal review standards depend on the prompt the operator happens to write
Pontivus Legal
Internal review rules and contract-type context stay visible inside the review workflow
ChatGPT
Sensitive details can be pasted into the chat depending on user behavior
Pontivus Legal
Sensitive details can be redacted before AI analysis begins
ChatGPT
Reviewers must manually track which clause affects which party
Pontivus Legal
Party roles, obligations, and counterparty context are part of clause review
ChatGPT
Reviewer handoff, send-back, and sign-off happen outside the chat
Pontivus Legal
Reviewers can approve or send back drafts through a visible governed path
Generic chat starts from pasted text. Pontivus adds a governed contract workflow with evidence, business context, party awareness, PII controls, and visible reviewer approval.
Inspectable controls for redaction, traceability, business rules, and reviewer approval.
Designed for controlled rollout settings where legal teams need to inspect the workflow, evidence, and review controls before expanding usage.
01
Sensitive details can be removed before the model reviews contract text.
02
Clause findings stay linked to retrieved legal text and citation history.
03
Reviewer feedback, send-backs, and approval gates stay visible on the draft.
Contract Editor
Master Services Agreement · Clause 12
Nanthawat P.
Sent BackSend back: clarify carve-out for gross negligence and preserve Thai-law enforceability.
Review Actions
Approve this version or request changes.
Approval Gate
Blocked until reviewer comments close
Tell us about your legal review workflow. We will follow up with a focused pilot walkthrough using a sample Thai-law contract.
Review clauses with visible Thai-law evidence and citations
Redact sensitive details before analysis begins
See reviewer comments, send-backs, and approval gates in one flow
We'll respond within 24 hours.