Pilot Access

← Overview

Thai law firms & in-house legal teams

Audit-ready contract review for your firm

One governed contract record from DOCX import or a generated first working draft through partner or senior approval.

Cited Thai law per clause, controlled revisions, and versioned junior–partner/senior approvals on one governed record.

Request Private Pilot Access

Five stages on one record

What junior lawyers run and what partners or seniors sign off on.

Each step states the outcome first. Open it for DOCX import or Generate draft setup, cited law, approvals, and what stays on the contract record.

01

Get the contract on the record — DOCX import or Generate draft

Import DOCX file with the identification of clauses for review. Set the contracting party you represent so that the analysis focuses on protecting the interests of your client.

DOCX import or a generated first working draft; party you represent, review standard, and firm review policies

Generate a first working draft from your review standard: set the party you represent, the counterparty, and deal background & purpose. The draft follows the standard’s language (Thai or English), then enters the same governed review and partner or senior sign-off as a contract imported from DOCX.

Upload one language per document: Thai or English. Match the file to your review standard.

Reviewers mark PII before any text reaches an AI model.

Your review standard sets agreement structure: expected clauses and how they relate.

Firm review policies (compliance, risk, and business stance) apply to that agreement.

01 — A

DOCX import

Review standard: Master Service Agreement Representing: Andaman Systems Integration Co., Ltd.

Contract Parties

Parties

Status In clause review

Siam Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Principal

Andaman Systems Integration Co., Ltd.

Contractor

PII redacted

2 redactions

Status In clause review

Clause 12

Limitation of Liability

The total aggregate liability of the Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed...

Siam Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Location: Clause 1 • Parties
Occurrence in source document 1 • Page 1
Andaman Systems Integration Co., Ltd.
Location: Clause 1 • Parties
Occurrence in source document 2 • Page 1

01 — B

Generate draft

Generate draft

First working draft from your review standard

Status Ready to generate
Review standard
Master Service Agreement
Party you represent
Andaman Systems Integration Co., Ltd.
Counterparty
Beta Systems Ltd.
Deal background & purpose
Software integration NDA — share technical specs under confidentiality before commercial terms.

Both paths converge at clause-level review with cited Thai law.

02

Surface legal and business risks

Ask questions on each clause. Clauses are checked against agreement structure from your review standard.

Agreement structure, cited Thai law, and findings

Findings apply your review standard and firm review policies, together with related clauses and cited Thai law for the question you ask.

Relevant Thai statutory text is cited in the analysis for the clause you are reviewing and the question you ask.

Citations draw from a curated body of Thai legal acts (16,000+ chapters). Your lawyers verify and decide on the basis.

Contract review

Clause 12: Limitation of Liability

Status In clause review
Activity Analysis Review
Contract Version: v3.2 Clause 12: Limitation of Liability

Clause 12

Limitation of Liability

The total aggregate liability of the Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed...

Clause finding High Risk

Liability cap conflicts with CCC Section 373 — Thai law voids any pre-contractual waiver of fraud or gross negligence by the debtor.

Cited Thai law

CCC §373

มาตรา 373 ความตกลงทำไว้ล่วงหน้าเป็นข้อความยกเว้นมิให้ลูกหนี้ต้องรับผิดเพื่อกลฉ้อฉลหรือความประมาทเลินเล่ออย่างร้ายแรงของตนนั้น ท่านว่าเป็นโมฆะ

Section 373: An agreement made in advance exonerating the debtor from his own fraud or gross negligence is void.

03

Draft controlled revisions

Turn findings into suggested edits with track changes. Every deletion and insertion stays visible on the clause.

Finding links and review-standard limits

Each suggestion links to its review finding. Your review standard and firm review policies shape what the system may propose.

Contract review

Clause 12: Limitation of Liability

Status In clause review

Track changes on clause text

Removed Added

Clause 12

Limitation of Liability

The total aggregate liability of the Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed the fees paid in the preceding twelve (12) monthstwelve (12) months preceding the claim, except where Thai law prohibits limitation for fraud or gross negligence.

Linked finding High Risk

Liability cap conflicts with CCC Section 373 — Thai law voids any pre-contractual waiver of fraud or gross negligence by the debtor.

Reason for suggestion

Aligns liability cap with CCC Section 373 — preserves enforceability under Thai law while reflecting negotiated commercial terms.

04

Partner approval

Reviewer comments on marked text, kept per clause version and separate from the analysis thread.

Marked-up comments and send-back

Comments attach to selected words so juniors see exactly what was flagged. Returns for revision and approvals are recorded on each clause version.

Contract review

Clause 12: Limitation of Liability

Status In clause review
Activity Analysis Review
Clause 12: Limitation of Liability Contract Version: v3.2 2 comments on this clause version

Track changes on clause text

Limitation of Liability

The total aggregate liability of the Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed the fees paid in the preceding twelve (12) monthstwelve (12) months preceding the claim, except where Thai law prohibits limitation for fraud or gross negligence.

NP

Nanthawat P.

Sent Back

Review comment on marked text

Send back: clarify carve-out for gross negligence and preserve Thai-law enforceability.

Approval Gate: Blocked until reviewer comments close

05

Deliver in Word

Export the approved contract as DOCX. The file contains the clause text your team approved, ready for final formatting in Microsoft Word and delivery to the client.

Review history record vs Word document file

Reviewer comments, approval workflows, and clause history reside on the Pontivus contract record, not embedded in a Word file.

DOCX export

Approved contract text returns to Microsoft Word for final formatting and client delivery. Reviewer comments and approval steps stay on the contract record, not in the Word file.

Partner or senior sign-off on the record

After your review standard and cited law surface risks, partner or senior sign-off and send-back steps stay on the contract record. Export approved contract text as DOCX when ready.

  • Reviewer comments on marked text, kept per clause version and separate from the analysis thread

  • Send-back and junior–partner/senior approval steps before the contract version moves forward

  • Findings, revisions, and reviewer decisions preserved when staff change. The record stays on the contract record.

Clause-level legal grounding

For each clause, analysis stays on your client's side: the clause under review and the question you ask.

Relevant Thai statutory text is cited in the analysis response so your lawyers can verify and decide on the basis.

Citations are selected for that clause and question, not a generic chat answer. Reviewers validate interpretation before the contract version moves forward.

Statutory text is drawn from a curated body of Thai legal acts (16,000+ chapters). Cited in analysis when relevant, not a standalone statute browser.

Data handling and legal compliance

  • Reviewers mark PII in the contract before any text reaches an AI model.
  • AI inference uses disclosed third-party providers (sub-processors); see the Privacy Notice for cross-border details.
  • Each clause version keeps analysis output, reviewer comments, and approval steps on the contract record.

Read the Privacy Notice →

Data and controls

PII marking before inference, Germany/GDPR hosting, cited Thai law on findings.

01

PII redaction before AI analysis

Reviewers mark PII in the contract before any text reaches an AI model. Redaction stays under reviewer control: not automated, not silent.

02

Cited law attached to findings

Each finding links to the Thai legal text it cites. Citations are chosen for that clause and your question. Your lawyers verify and decide.

03

Stored and processed in Germany under GDPR

Contract workflow is hosted in Germany under EU GDPR. PII marking, retention, and sub-processors are covered in Data handling and legal compliance and our Privacy Notice.

Advised by Thai commercial counsel

Practising lawyers with in-house and law-firm experience help shape how Pontivus supports clause review, cited Thai law, and approval workflows. Grounded in how teams actually review contracts.

Arada Pinyoying — Pontivus Legal advisor

Arada Pinyoying

Managing Director, Pro-Legal Services

LL.B., Assumption University · Lawyers Council of Thailand member

Experience
15+ years
Practice focus
Corporate contracts · eDiscovery
Languages
Thai · English

Practice background spans Thai legal document services, eDiscovery, and litigation support. Previously a corporate lawyer at Acclime.

Advises on contract review workflow and legal document operations.

Chintana Sittisongkram — Pontivus Legal advisor

Chintana Sittisongkram

Senior Legal Manager, Hyundai Mobility Thailand

LL.B. LL.M (Intellectual Property and International Trade Law)

Experience
15+ years
Practice focus
Commercial law · Regulatory
Languages
Thai · English

Senior in-house counsel with experience in Thai commercial contracts and regulatory compliance. Advises on the accuracy of AI-generated findings against the Thai Civil and Commercial Code.

Reviews AI-generated findings against Thai statutory authority.

How Pontivus differs from general AI

General AI restarts with a blank prompt each session. Pontivus keeps party, review standard, and firm review policies on one governed contract record, with cited Thai law per clause and partner or senior approval on the version trail.

Expand details to specify the party, review standard, agreement structure, and firm policies when importing a DOCX or generating a first working draft on the governed record.

Category comparison (Word add-ins, redline tools, general AI) →

Thai legal acts as a source

ChatGPT / Claude / Copilot

Processes from general data. No specifically curated Thai legal database to use as a reference in each clause.

Pontivus Legal

Cited Thai statutory text on each finding, grounded in the clause under review and what you ask. Drawn from a curated body of Thai acts (16,000+ chapters).

AI output and traceability

ChatGPT / Claude / Copilot

Free-form text; reasoning quality depends entirely on what the user pasted into the prompt

Pontivus Legal

Per clause, reasoning and cited Thai acts appear in the analysis. Suggested edits link to those findings.

PII redaction before AI analysis

ChatGPT / Claude / Copilot

Not available. Text is sent to the model as pasted.

Pontivus Legal

Reviewers control PII redaction before AI-assisted analysis

Review workflow

ChatGPT / Claude / Copilot

Single-user chat. No in-text annotations, no roles, no approval gates.

Pontivus Legal

Clause analysis and cited law sit in one thread. Reviewer comments on marked text are separate and stored per clause version. A separate editor role applies changes. Junior–partner/senior approval and return for revision are built in.

Version history and audit trail

ChatGPT / Claude / Copilot

No persistent state. Every session starts blank.

Pontivus Legal

Each clause version keeps its review output and reviewer comments on the contract record. Approved contract text exports to Word as DOCX. The review trail stays on Pontivus.

Thai & English contracts + DOCX

ChatGPT / Claude / Copilot

Q&A from uploaded or pasted text. No governed contract record, review standard, or approval workflow.

Pontivus Legal

Separate Thai-only and English-only contracts: one language per document, matched to your review standard. Import DOCX or generate a first working draft in that language. Export approved contract text to DOCX.

Storage, workflow, and what the AI model sees

ChatGPT / Claude / Copilot

Stored and processed in the United States (OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft); the full pasted contract text reaches the model directly

Pontivus Legal

All contract documents and review audit trails are hosted in Germany, governed by rigorous global data privacy standards. The AI model analyzes only text from which PII and firm-sensitive confidential information have been completely redacted before transmission.

Credits and billing

Each subscription includes a monthly credit allowance for AI-assisted contract review. Credits are consumed when your firm creates a contract (DOCX import or Generate draft), applies a review standard, and runs clause-level analysis through partner or senior sign-off.

What credits are used for

  1. Creating a contract on Pontivus — by DOCX import or Generate draft — as a governed contract record
  2. Applying your review standard and contract-type rules that shape clause-level analysis
  3. Clause-level analysis, reviewer comments, and approval steps on that contract

Monthly allowances by tier

Monthly credit pool per tier; resets each billing month (rollover per agreement).

SME

5 seats

15,000 credits / month included

Firm

15 seats

60,000 credits / month included

Founding Firm tier prices and the pilot application are on the landing page.

Request Private Pilot Access →

If you exceed your allowance

Top-up credits from ฿799. In-product usage view before month-end.

Billing cadence and pilot terms

Monthly billing default. First ten firms that complete the pilot and subscribe may lock the Founding Firm rate for 24 months.

10% off quarterly20% off half-yearly

More than 15 seats? Contact us →

Request Private Pilot Access